RAJNESH Vs NEHA Affidavit for Income And Maintenance : Supreme Court Judgment

Rajnesh Vs Neha Affidavit

Note : This Article/Post is the copy and paste of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Please read the PDF of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Link/URL of the PFD attached with this Article/Post.



Image Product Feature Price
TOP Pick
WallMantra Madhubani Painting
  • Set of 8 Ethnic Painting
  • Traditional Madhubani Art Painting
  • Madhubani Painting for Living Room
Buy Now
WallMantra Indian Folk Art Madhubani
  • Madhubani Art Frame Set of 6
  • Madhubani Painting for Living Room
  • Madhubani Painting for Office
Buy Now
TOP Pick
Tamatina Madhubani Art Canvas Painting
  • Madhubani Art Painting
  • Size-13X10 Inches
  • Face of Tradition
Buy Now

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9503 of 2018)

RAJNESH                 …APPELLANT


NEHA & Anr.           …RESPONDENTS


PART A    Order passed in Criminal Appeal No.730 of 2020
   General Guidelines and Directions
Issue of Overlapping Jurisdictions
Payment of interim maintenance
Criteria for determining quantum of maintenance
Date from which Maintenance to be awarded
Enforcement of orders of maintenance
Final Directions



Leave granted.

(i) The present Criminal Appeal arises out of an application for Interim Maintenance filed in a petition u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. by the Respondentwife and minor son. The Respondent No.1wife left the matrimonial home in January 2013, shortly after the birth of the sonRespondent No.2. On 02.09.2013, the wife filed an application for interim maintenance u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. on behalf of herself and the minor son. The Family Court vide a detailed Order dated 24.08.2015 awarded interim maintenance of Rs.15,000 per month to the Respondent No.1 wife from 01.09.2013; and Rs.5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the Respondent No.2son from 01.09.2013 to 31.08.2015; and @ Rs. 10,000 per month from 01.09.2015 onwards till further orders were passed in the main petition.

(ii) The Appellanthusband challenged the Order of the Family Court vide Criminal Writ Petition No.875/2015 filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition vide Order dated 14.08.2018, and affirmed the Judgment passed by the Family Court.

(iii) The present appeal has been filed to impugn the Order dated 14.08.2018. This Court issued notice to the wife and directed the Appellanthusband to file his Income Tax Returns and Assessment Orders for the period from 20052006 till date. He was also directed to place a photocopy of his passport on record. By a further Order dated 11.09.2019, the Appellanthusband was directed to make payment of the arrears of Rs.2,00,000 towards interim maintenance to the wife; and a further amount of Rs.3,00,000, which was due and payable to the wife towards arrears of maintenance, as per his own admission. By a subsequent Order dated 14.10.2019, it was recorded that only a part of the arrears had been paid. A final opportunity was granted to the Appellanthusband to make payment of the balance amount by 30.11.2019, failing which, the Court would proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience with the Orders passed by this Court.


In the backdrop of the facts of this case, we considered it fit to frame guidelines on certain aspects pertaining to the payment of maintenance in matrimonial matters. There are different statutes providing for making an application for grant of maintenance / interim maintenance, if any person having sufficient means neglects, or refuses to maintain his wife, children, parents. The different enactments provide an independent and distinct remedy framed with a specific object and purpose. Inspite of time frames being prescribed by various statutes for disposal of interim applications, we have noticed, in practice that in a vast majority of cases, the applications are not disposed of within the time frame prescribed. To address various issues which arise for consideration in applications for grant of maintenance / interim maintenance, it is necessary to frame guidelines to ensure that there is uniformity and consistency in deciding the same. To seek assistance on these issues, we have appointed Ms. Anitha Shenoy and Mr. Gopal Sankaranaryanan, Senior Advocates as Amici Curiae, who have graciously accepted to assist this Court.

(iv) By a further Order dated 17.12.2019, the Appellant was directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,45,000 to the Respondent no.1-wife within a period of 45 days.

On the issue of framing guidelines, the National Legal Services Authority was directed to elicit responses from the State Legal Services Authorities of various States.

(v) By a subsequent Order dated 05.08.2020, it was recorded that an Affidavit of Compliance had been filed on 04.08.2020 by the Appellant-husband, wherein it was stated that arrears of Rs.1,45,000 till 11.09.2019 had been paid by him in January, 2020. However, he had made no further payment to the wife thereafter. With respect to the amount of Rs.10,000 p.m. payable for the minor son, the Order had been complied with till July 2020. A statement was made by the Counsel for the Appellant that he was not disputing the payment of maintenance for his son, and would continue to pay the same. A direction was issued by this Court to pay the entire arrears of maintenance to the wife @ Rs.15,000 p.m. as fixed by the Family Court, and continue to pay the said amount during the pendency of proceedings.

(vi) By the Order dated 25.08.2020, it was noted that the Appellant had filed an Affidavit dated 23.08.2020 wherein he had admitted and acknowledged that an amount of Rs.5,00,000 was pending towards arrears of maintenance to the Respondent No.1-wife. The Appellant was directed to pay 50% of the arrears within a period of 4 weeks to the Respondent No.1, failing which, he was directed to remain present before the Court on the next date of hearing. The Counsel for the husband placed on record a chart of various proceedings pending between the parties. Taking note of the aforesaid facts, we considered it appropriate to refer the matter for mediation by Mr. Shridhar Purohit, Advocate, a well-known Mediator in Nagpur, to resolve all disputes pending between the parties, and arrive at an overall settlement.

Download RAJNESH Vs NEHA Affidavit PDF

About Author: I am Varun Kr. Jha, founder and author of this website. I am a passionate writer and researcher with a keen interest in law, technologies and gadgets. I strive to provide informative and engaging content that helps my readers learn and grow. I am always looking for new ways to share my knowledge and insights with others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fifteen + 19 =